Outrageously Funny Search Suggestion Engine :: 2 Kings 15:2

👉 Sixteen years old was he when he began to reign, and he reigned two and fifty years in Jerusalem. And his mothers name [was] Jecholiah of Jerusalem.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this Bible verse together. It tells us a lot about King Jehoab the Elder – one of the kings of Judah during a really difficult time. Here's what it means in simple terms: The Basic Story: “Sixteen years old when he began to reign…” – This is the beginning of a long, challenging period for the king. He was young and just starting out as ruler. “…and he reigned two and fifty years in Jerusalem.” – He ruled for about 26 years! That’s a significant amount of time. “And his mother’s name [was] Jecholiah of Jerusalem.” – This is the most important part. His mother was named Jecholiah, which was the name of the king at that time. What it's saying: This verse describes a period where King Jehoab the Elder was in charge of the kingdom of Judah (a region in ancient Israel). He ruled for a long time, and his mother was the queen of Jerusalem. Important Context – It’s about a Time of Trouble: The Bible tells us this period was extremely difficult. The story follows a series of disasters and conflicts. This verse is part of a larger narrative that highlights the challenges King Jehoab faced and, ultimately, how he survived and maintained his position. In short, it’s a story about a king who had to be strong and resilient during a time when things were really tough. --- Do you want me to: Explain why this verse is significant in biblical history? Give you some background on the kingdom of Judah at that time? Discuss what kind of challenges King Jehoab faced?

👉 And Menahem exacted the money of Israel, [even] of all the mighty men of wealth, of each man fifty shekels of silver, to give to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria turned back, and stayed not there in the land.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 15:20 together. It’s a really important part of understanding a pivotal moment in Israel's history. Here’s what it means, explained simply: The Basic Story: Menahem is the King: This verse tells us about King Menahem of Judah. He was a powerful ruler and had to collect money for the Israelites. A Huge Amount of Money: He demanded all the money from the people – not just the wealthy, but everyone who had wealth. It was a massive amount! Each Person Paid 50 Shekels: Each person had to give him 50 silver coins (which were a common form of currency in ancient times). That’s a lot of money for one person! The King Turned Back: This is the key part. Instead of staying in the land, the King of Assyria turned back and left. What's the Significance? This verse is about a really serious warning to the Israelites. It’s saying: Don’t be complacent! Don’t trust anyone who seems powerful or wealthy. Here’s what it suggests: The Assyrians were a Threat: The Assyrian Empire was a huge, powerful force at the time. They were known for their brutality and expansion. They Were Watching: This verse shows that the Assyrians weren't just interested in collecting money; they were observing the Israelites and seeing them as a potential threat to their power. A Sign of Trouble: Menahem’s demanding this huge amount of money, combined with his decision to leave, is seen as a sign of trouble for Israel. It suggests that the Israelites needed to be vigilant and protect themselves from potential dangers. In short, it's a story about a king who was trying to collect too much money, and the Assyrians responded by turning back, warning the Israelites to stay safe. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the verse? Discuss the context of this event in biblical history?

👉 And the rest of the acts of Menahem, and all that he did, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 15:21. It's a really important passage about King Menahem’s actions and his leadership. Here’s what it means, explained simply: The Basic Idea: This verse is essentially saying that all of Menahem’s significant deeds – everything he did as king – are recorded in the Chronicle of the kings of Israel. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “And the rest of the acts of Menahem…” This refers to all of Menahem’s official duties and responsibilities while he was ruling. Think of it as his entire reign. “…and all that he did…” This is a general statement about his leadership. “[are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?” This is the key part. The Chronicle was a historical record – a detailed account of the history of the Israelites, as told by the kings. It’s like a big, complete diary of their past. What does this mean practically? It means that Menahem's entire reign and his actions were meticulously documented in the official records of the Israelite kings. It shows that he was a responsible and successful ruler who was thoroughly recorded in history. Why is it significant? This verse emphasizes: Historical Record: It highlights that the Kings of Israel weren't just making decisions; they were also being documented for posterity. Responsibility & Accountability: It suggests that Menahem was held accountable for his actions and that his deeds would be remembered. In short, it’s a statement about the importance of recording history – particularly the accomplishments of those in power. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Give you some context about the time period this verse comes from?

👉 And Menahem slept with his fathers; and Pekahiah his son reigned in his stead.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 15:22. It's a really important passage about the rise and fall of power in Israel. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse says that Menahem, a young man named Menahem, peacefully slept while his father, Pekahiah, ruled in his stead. Let’s unpack that a little further: Menahem: This was a young, quiet boy who was likely a royal or important figure. Pekahiah: This was his father, and he held a position of power – perhaps a judge or leader. “He reigned in his stead”: This is the key part. It means that Pekahiah continued to hold the authority and responsibilities that Menahem had been assigned to. He was essentially the successor . What's the big takeaway? This verse describes a period of stability and quietness after the reign of a powerful king, but it also points towards potential trouble to come. It suggests that Pekahiah’s rule was short-lived and that there would be challenges for the future. Context is important: 2 Kings 15:22 is part of a larger story about a period of instability in Israel before the rise of King Pekah. It's often interpreted as foreshadowing the eventual conflict between Pekah and Ahab, which eventually led to the downfall of the wicked king. Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Give you more context about this story?

👉 In the fiftieth year of Azariah king of Judah Pekahiah the son of Menahem began to reign over Israel in Samaria, [and reigned] two years.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down that verse. It’s a pretty significant passage from the Old Testament! Here's what it means in simple terms: The Basic Story: Azariah was King: This verse tells us about a king named Azariah who ruled in Judah (a region near Jerusalem). Pekahiah Came to Power: A man named Pekahiah took over as king. He came to power in Samaria – that’s a city far to the east of Jerusalem. Two Years Reign: He reigned for two years! What's the Big Picture? This verse is about a shift in power and a period of instability. It suggests that Pekahiah was a bit of a troublemaker. He wasn’t a good ruler, and his rule caused problems for Israel (the people God gave to them). In essence, it's a record of a time when the situation was tense because a king was challenging God's plan. Important Note: The Bible doesn't always give us a perfect explanation of why Pekahiah was so problematic. It’s a moment in history where things were shifting, and it sets the stage for later events in the Old Testament. Do you want me to explain any part of this verse in more detail? For example, would you like to know: What "Azariah" is connected to? Why was Pekahiah a problem?

👉 And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD: he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse. It’s a pretty serious one and speaks about a significant turning point in biblical history. Here's a simple explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a moment of extreme wickedness by God, specifically targeting King Jeroboam. It says that while he was doing something truly bad – and it wasn’t just a small mistake – he didn’t stop. He continued to commit the same sins he had previously done. Let's unpack it piece by piece: "And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD:" This is a very strong way of saying "He did something terrible." “Evil” means morally wrong or sinful. It’s not just a minor transgression; it’s a significant act that goes against God's will and principles. "he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat..." This is crucial. “Departed” means stopped, halted, or abandoned. Jeroboam was King of Israel, and this verse says he continued to do the same bad things – the same sins – that he had previously done. "...who made Israel to sin." This tells us why it was evil. Jeroboam's actions led to Israel disobeying God’s commands and committing sin. In short, this verse describes a period where King Jeroboam continued to be a bad person, and that badness continues to affect the people of Israel. What does this tell us about God's perspective? This verse is often interpreted as a sign that God was disappointed with Jeroboam’s leadership. It suggests that God wasn’t satisfied by Jeroboam’s actions and might have been angry or concerned about the continued spread of sin. It highlights a challenging time for Israel, showing God's judgment and desire for righteousness. Important Note: This is just one verse in a longer story! The Bible often has layers of meaning, and this verse is part of a larger narrative that explores themes of disobedience, punishment, and God’s plan for humanity. --- Do you want me to: Explain another passage from the same book? Discuss the context surrounding this verse in more detail (like its time period)?

👉 But Pekah the son of Remaliah, a captain of his, conspired against him, and smote him in Samaria, in the palace of the kings house, with Argob and Arieh, and with him fifty men of the Gileadites: and he killed him, and reigned in his room.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 15:25. It's a pretty dramatic scene – it describes a violent act that sets the stage for a larger conflict. Here’s a simple explanation: The Basic Story: Pekah is the Enemy: The verse tells us about Pekah, a leader of a small tribe called the Gileadites. He was actively plotting against King Ashur of Israel. A Conspiracy: He formed a group – a "captain" – to attack King Ashur. The Attack in Samaria: This group attacked King Ashur’s palace in Samaria, which is a very important city and center of power for the Israelites. The Massacre: They killed Pekah! They did this with two swords: Argob and Arieh. He Killed Pekah & Reigns: Most importantly, they killed Pekah and he reigned in his own room – meaning he held a position of power within the palace. Putting it into simpler terms: Pekah was determined to cause trouble for King Ashur. He gathered a group of rebels and attacked him, killing him outright. It’s like a rebellion that escalated into a violent act against the king. Key Takeaway: This verse is about a violent act – a rebellion and a massacre – driven by Pekah's desire for power. It highlights how quickly things can escalate in conflict. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse from 2 Kings? Talk about the context of this passage (like why it’s significant)?

👉 And the rest of the acts of Pekahiah, and all that he did, behold, they [are] written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 15:26. It's a bit complex, but here’s a simplified explanation: Basically, this verse is saying that all the actions and deeds of a man named Pekahiah – who lived in Israel during a time when his brother, Pekah, was king – are recorded in a historical record called the “Chronicles of the Kings of Israel.” Let’s unpack it further: “And the rest of the acts of Pekahiah…” : This refers to everything that Pekahiah did. It's a comprehensive list of his actions, big and small. “…and all that he did…” : This is a general statement about his entire reign. “Behold, they [are] written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel.” : This is the key part. The “Chronicles” were essentially a historical record kept by the kings of Israel – like a very detailed diary of their history. This verse means that all these actions and deeds have been meticulously documented within this historical book. What does it tell us? It's a record of his rule: It shows what Pekahiah was up to while he was king. It’s important for understanding the past: The Chronicles provides a way to learn about the history of Israel and the kings who ruled over them. It’s a historical account: This isn’t just random events; it's carefully documented as part of the story of Israel's past. In short, this verse is saying that we have a complete history of Pekahiah's reign, recorded in a book that tells the story of Israel. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Give you some context about this passage within the larger biblical narrative?

👉 In the two and fiftieth year of Azariah king of Judah Pekah the son of Remaliah began to reign over Israel in Samaria, [and reigned] twenty years.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this Bible verse together. It’s a bit complex, but we can understand it easily. Here’s what it means: Essentially, this verse tells us about a period of conflict and instability in Israel. “In the two and fiftieth year of Azariah”: This refers to a king named Azariah who ruled in Judah (a region in the south of Israel). “Two and fifty” is a long period – it’s 25 years. The word "Azariah" is important; it's a royal name, suggesting he was a powerful and perhaps somewhat troublesome ruler. “king of Judah Pekah the son of Remaliah”: This identifies the king we're talking about: Pekah. He was a ruler in Judah – that’s the area that later became Israel. “began to reign over Israel in Samaria, [and reigned] twenty years.” This is the key part. Pekah began ruling over Israel in Samaria . Samaria was a significant city and a place of importance for the Israelites. He ruled for twenty years. So, what's the big picture? This verse describes a long period of conflict between Pekah and his brother, Ahab. Pekah’s reign was marked by instability and war. It shows that after Ahab’s death, there were several wars fought in the region. In short: The verse describes a time when a king named Pekah ruled over Israel in Samaria for twenty years. It's a story of conflict and a period of hardship for the Israelites. --- Do you want me to: Explain why this verse is significant? (e.g., it’s part of a larger narrative about the rise and fall of kingdoms?) Give you more context – like what happened before or after this event?

👉 And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD: he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse together. It’s a pretty serious one and speaks about a significant moment in biblical history. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: This verse comes from the Book of 2 Kings, chapter 15, and it describes a period where King Solomon’s son, Jeroboam, was acting very recklessly and causing trouble for Israel. God saw this and became very angry with him. What “He did” Means: “He did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD” – This is a strong way of saying that he committed something morally wrong or sinful. It’s not just a simple mistake; it's something that God saw as bad and displeased with. What He Was Doing: “He departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin.” – This is the key part. Jeroboam’s father, Nebat, was a king who made Israel disobey God by allowing them to commit sin. King Solomon's son, Jeroboam, continued this pattern. He disobeyed God and led his people down a path of wrongdoing. In short: King Solomon’s son, Jeroboam, continued to make mistakes that angered God and caused trouble for Israel. What it tells us about God's perspective: Judgment: The verse highlights God’s judgment on those who disobey Him. Responsibility: It shows that individuals are accountable for their choices and actions. Jeroboam’s disobedience was a consequence of his own choices. --- Important Note: This is a difficult passage, and it's important to remember that the Bible often deals with complex themes. If you want to delve deeper, I can point you towards resources explaining these concepts in more detail – like theological explanations or historical context. Would you like me to: Explain any of this in more detail? Give you some background on the story of Jeroboam and Nebat?